At some point in your option-trading career, you're probably going to come across the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula. So you won't mind if we break it down into simpler terms that should be useful.
Black Scholes. Those two words have very nearly defined options trading for the past 40 years. Fischer Black and Myron Scholes, two University of Chicago economists, published the eponymous formula back in 1973 and nearly 500 monthly expirations later, the trading industry still relies on the formula and its variants to generate theoretical option values. The formula itself is, shall we say, a bit dense:
Ugh. This is part of the reason many retail traders take a pass on studying it too closely. Most of the articles about Black Scholes are written by math geeks showing off how well they can untangle that knot. And that complexity can also disguise its value.
In my case, I’m a trader, not a mathematician. So this article is going to be like a Cliff Notes breakdown. Why bother? Because knowing a bit of theory behind Black Scholes can make you a smarter trader. And this article may very well be all you’ll ever need to know about it.
Now, keep in mind that I’m taking short cuts to describe the formula. There are whole books written on it by finance professors that will describe in great detail its derivation. If you’re a glutton for punishment, read the books. Everybody else, read on.
The world welcomed Black Sholes because it was the first closed-form (as in “stick in the inputs and get an answer”) formula to help evaluate an option. Using put-call parity, it was easy to value a call as long as you knew the price of the put at the same strike and price of the stock, and vice versa. But what if you didn’t know the price of either the call or the put? That’s where Black Scholes came in. Drilling down, the formula requires five inputs:
1. Current stock price (“S”) 2. Strike price of the option (“K”) 3. The risk-free interest rate like the T-bill yield (“r”) 4. Time to expiration (“T”) 5. Volatility (“O”) (More on “O” later)
The formula itself— c=SN(d 1 ) – Ke– rT N(d 2 )—states that the price of a call is the value of the shares of stock that would hedge that call, minus the value of a risk-free bond equal to the strike price. Huh? Right. Well, Black Scholes values an option as a dynamic, self-financing portfolio. Don’t get hung up on that.
What’s more important is this:
What " 1n (S/K) ” does is turn the stock price S into a variable that is some percent higher or lower than the strike price K. By doing that, Black Scholes converts a stock price, which can never have a negative value, into something that can—a percentage. That’s why Black Scholes uses the normal distribution—the “bell curve”, a well-established statistical theory—as part of its calculation.
That percentage stock price moves up and down randomly according to this part:
The “random walk” pushes the stock price up by “r” (hey, if you invest in a risky stock, your expected return should be at least as high as the risk-free rate), plus a random impact higher or lower from volatility (“O”). The higher the volatility, the wider the potential percent price changes beyond the risk-free rate.
Dividing by this:
converts the percentage stock price into a standard normal variable, which lets us calculate the probability that the stock will have a percentage change large enough to reach the strike price. The percentage price changes move randomly around an average value, with smaller changes more likely, and larger changes less likely.
It’s not the stock price itself that’s random. It’s the day-to-day percentage changes that are random. The model assumes those changes are independent from one day to the next. What happened yesterday has no influence on what happens today, which has no influence on tomorrow. Specifically, no matter how many days a stock has rallied or dropped, it doesn’t affect the probability of whether it will go up or down the next day.
The genius of Black Scholes turned a stock into a standard normal variable that moved up and down randomly, and where the magnitude of the percentage changes was governed by volatility. So, the Black Scholes option value had no directional indication. Black Scholes didn’t have any input for how bearish some analysts might be, or how bullish a chart pattern might be. It didn’t care. What Black Scholes did care about is the magnitude of potential stock-price changes higher or lower.
For instance, how likely is a 1%, 2,%, 5%, 10% or more price change up or down between now and the option’s expiration? Stop and think about that. The Black Scholes theory that underpins so much of the trading and investment industry doesn't actually believe there’s any value in trying to determine the direction of a stock. Despite all the Wall Street analysts trying to predict stock prices, despite the various and sundry market predictions by all the talking heads on financial networks, Black Scholes simply suggests stock-price changes are random.
But while the up/down direction is random, the magnitude of price changes isn’t exactly. It’s volatility that gives us an idea of the probability that the stock price will change by some percentage up or down. And we can use that information to choose a strategy.
For example, selling options that are outside an expected up/down range, in a stock with a quantifiable probability of the stock not breaking through that range, is a technique often used by professional traders. They don’t try to pick direction by looking at charts, financial metrics, or analyst reports. They try to guess magnitude by looking at volatility.
Despite its longevity and power, Black Scholes does have some weaknesses. First, it only prices European-style options. It doesn’t factor in the early-exercise feature of American-style options. Second, it assumes that dividends are paid at a constant rate, not once a quarter as you see in most US stocks. Third, it assumes that volatility is constant over the life of the option. Despite the limitations, its underlying assumptions are carried into most other option-pricing formulas that solve those problems, like the Bjerksund-Stensland model used for American-style options on the thinkorswim® trading platform (For more, see "Three's Company" below). The Black Scholes theory is behind the probability models on the platform, too.
Does Black Scholes generate accurate theoretical option values? Yes, with one caveat. Using a single volatility for all the strike prices won’t generate accurate theoretical values. The volatility skew, with higher volatilities for out-of-the-money options, reflects the market’s opinion of how large the percentage-price changes of a stock price might be.
In the end, if you base your trading strategies on option prices themselves, probabilities and volatility, Black Scholes has your back. It’s no guarantee of profits. But you’re on solid theoretical ground. Of course it helps to have the theoretical tools at your fingertips on thinkorswim so you don’t need to deal with the formulas yourself. We figured out the math. Now put it to good use.
If Black Scholes is so hot, why does the thinkorswim platform use the binomial and the Bjerksund-Stensland models as well? You can see those choices on the model drop-down menu on the Analyze page. Black Scholes isn’t the best for American-style options, so the binomial model was added to come up with the theoretical values and greeks for American-style options (which are the majority of the options available in the US). Plus, the binomial model is better at factoring discrete dividend payments, where Black Scholes uses a continuous yield.
But the binomial model is slow to compute because is uses an "iterative" method. When you need to calculate hundreds of greeks and option values with real-time data, binomial can get bogged down. In 2002, the Bjerksund-Stensland model was created. It’s a closed-form model (like Black Scholes), so it’s fast to compute, and it can value American-style options—which is why it's now the primary option pricing model in thinkorswim.
for thinkMoney ®
Financial Communications Society 2016
for Ticker Tape
Content Marketing Awards 2016
Content intended for educational/informational purposes only. Not investment advice, or a recommendation of any security, strategy, or account type.
Be sure to understand all risks involved with each strategy, including commission costs, before attempting to place any trade. Clients must consider all relevant risk factors, including their own personal financial situations, before trading.
Market volatility, volume, and system availability may delay account access and trade executions.
Past performance of a security or strategy does not guarantee future results or success.
Options are not suitable for all investors as the special risks inherent to options trading may expose investors to potentially rapid and substantial losses. Options trading subject to TD Ameritrade review and approval. Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options before investing in options.
Supporting documentation for any claims, comparisons, statistics, or other technical data will be supplied upon request.
This is not an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction where we are not authorized to do business or where such offer or solicitation would be contrary to the local laws and regulations of that jurisdiction, including, but not limited to persons residing in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, UK, and the countries of the European Union.
TD Ameritrade, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC, a subsidiary of The Charles Schwab Corporation. TD Ameritrade is a trademark jointly owned by TD Ameritrade IP Company, Inc. and The Toronto-Dominion Bank. © 2022 Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. All rights reserved.