As the first ‘Made in America’ week continues, we take a look at the state of US manufacturing and how Congress hopes to boost jobs in the industry.
The first “Made in America week” is coming to an end. The week kicked off with a product showcase at the White House, where American-made products ranging from a Lockheed Martin’s (LMT) Sikorsky helicopter to a Caterpillar (CAT) wheel loader were displayed. The White House also took this week as an opportunity to release a detailed list of objectives it hopes to accomplish renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Mexico and Canada.
Two of the primary goals of that renegotiation are to boost manufacturing jobs in the U.S. and increase domestic investment. While any renegotiation of the agreement is likely to be a complicated process, there’s a bipartisan bill that was introduced in early June focused on some of the same goals. Before we look at that bill, we’ll examine the state of manufacturing in the U.S. and some of the factors influencing job trends in the space.
Much like agriculture jobs over the course of the 20th Century, the number of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. has declined over the past several decades as global economies evolved, and automation and efficiency improvements reduced the number of jobs required in certain industries. From the mid-1960’s through 2000, the number of people in manufacturing jobs bounced between just under 17 million jobs and 19.5 million jobs, which was the peak back in 1979, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Since 2000, the number of manufacturing employees dropped from just over 17 million to just below 11.5 million, but has been slowly recovering since (figure 1 below). There’s a lot of factors at play that could be helping to drive the growth in manufacturing jobs, but one surprising factor is that it just isn’t as cheap to manufacture overseas as it used to be.
FIGURE 1: MANUFACTURING JOBS BOUNCING BACK.
The number of U.S. manufacturing employees declined through the end of 2009, but has slowly been increasing since then as global economic growth steadily increases. Chart source: thinkorswim® platform by TD Ameritrade. Source: Federal Reserve's FRED database. FRED® is a registered trademark of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis does not sponsor or endorse and is not affiliated with TD Ameritrade. For illustrative purposes only.
A 2014 report by the Boston Consulting Group, or BCG, found that the dynamics of global, low-cost manufacturing have been shifting. Their research stated “several economies that traditionally have been regarded as low-cost manufacturing bases appear to be under pressure as a result of a combination of factors that have significantly eroded their cost advantages since 2004.”
One of those countries that has been losing its cost advantage is China, which saw its manufacturing-cost advantage over the U.S. shrink to less than 5% according to BCG. Other countries including Brazil, Poland, the Czech Republic and Russia also saw their cost advantages erode relative to other countries.
In a 2015 BCG survey of senior manufacturing executives at companies with at least $1 billion in annual revenues, 31% of respondents said “their companies are most likely to add production capacity in the U.S. within five years for goods sold in the U.S., while 20% said they are most likely to add capacity in China.” Some of the factors BCG said has influenced those decisions include logistics, inventory costs, ease of doing business, and supply chain risks. In addition to those factors, the Invent and Manufacture in America Act might spur additional domestic investment in the future.
A bipartisan bill, dubbed the Invent and Manufacture in America Act, was introduced at the beginning of June by U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Pat Roberts (R-KS). Currently, there is a R&D tax credit available to businesses that incur research and development costs in the U.S. and the new bill would enhance that credit “by up to 25% for companies that perform the majority of manufacturing operations in the United States,” according to Senator Coons’ press release.
Manufacturers have already benefitted from the R&D tax credit, and the new bill would provide additional tax savings to a lot of them in the U.S. The proposed tax credit could make it even more cost effective for companies to maintain domestic manufacturing operations and increase domestic investment, something many companies have already started to do.
Depending on the business, manufacturing can be highly cyclical and jobs can ebb and flow based on global macroeconomic conditions, which are constantly in flux. But the growing attractiveness of the U.S. compared to other countries might make for a new American manufacturing renaissance in the years to come.
Check out the thinkorswim® platform by TD Ameritrade to learn more about tools that might help your trading research, including being able to analyze hundreds of economic data points like the one shown in this article.
for thinkMoney ®
Financial Communications Society 2016
for Ticker Tape
Content Marketing Awards 2016
Ameritrade and all third parties mentioned are separate and unaffiliated
companies, and are not responsible for each other’s policies, services or
specific security names in this commentary does not constitute a recommendation
from TD Ameritrade to buy, sell, or hold.
Market volatility, volume, and system availability may delay account access and trade executions.
Past performance of a security or strategy does not guarantee future results or success.
Options are not suitable for all investors as the special risks inherent to options trading may expose investors to potentially rapid and substantial losses. Options trading subject to TD Ameritrade review and approval. Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options before investing in options.
Supporting documentation for any claims, comparisons, statistics, or other technical data will be supplied upon request.
The information is not intended to be investment advice or construed as a recommendation or endorsement of any particular investment or investment strategy, and is for illustrative purposes only. Be sure to understand all risks involved with each strategy, including commission costs, before attempting to place any trade. Clients must consider all relevant risk factors, including their own personal financial situations, before trading.
This is not an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction where we are not authorized to do business or where such offer or solicitation would be contrary to the local laws and regulations of that jurisdiction, including, but not limited to persons residing in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, UK, and the countries of the European Union.
TD Ameritrade, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. TD Ameritrade is a trademark jointly owned by TD Ameritrade IP Company, Inc. and The Toronto-Dominion Bank. © 2019 TD Ameritrade.