History shows that Democrats have been kind to stocks. Surprised? Find out which stock sectors stand to improve under a Democratic president.
Editor’s note: This is the second in a three-part series on the presidential cycle and the 2016 election’s impact on the stock market. Read part one.
Quick quiz: Are donkeys or elephants better for the stock market? It may surprise some investors to learn that the broader stock market’s historical performance has been stronger under a White House Democrat versus the typically “pro-business” Republican eras.
As for specific sectors, the political affiliation of the man (or woman?) in charge can matter for the type of company and its business drivers—for instance, growth stocks compared to defensive sectors.
But first, those broad numbers. Since World War II, Democratic presidencies averaged an 11.2% gain in the S&P 500 (SPX) versus a 6.3% gain for stocks under Republican rule, according to Sam Stovall, managing director for U.S. equity strategy at S&P Capital IQ.
Some analysts pin the stronger stock returns to “big spending” Democratic policies, which have tended to translate into more vigorous economic growth, higher levels of consumer spending, and in turn, healthier corporate profits.
No matter whom you plan to vote for, all investors have a vested interest in Wall Street and the White House. What stock sectors could potentially benefit if a Democrat retains control of the presidency in 2016? (Don’t worry: We’ll follow up with typically GOP-friendly sectors in part three.)
Health care sector. The health care sector has been on a tear in 2015 and has generally outperformed the broader equity market. This sector includes biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, health care insurers, and health care equipment and supplies.
Although traditionally thought of as a defensive sector, health care stocks have gotten a boost from the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) after some bumps while the industry adapted to the new rules. But in its simplest terms, the ACA brought more Americans onto the health care insurance rolls, which translates into increased demand across the health care sector. Political analysts expect that a Democrat in the White House for four more years would keep the ACA, or some variation, in place and possibly expand health care initiatives, which could prove supportive for this sector.
Education companies. The trend toward for-profit education companies has grown in recent years. Many post-secondary education service providers—complete with tradable tickers—now dot the investing landscape. These companies and their shares have come under fire for reporting standards and have raised bigger sociological questions about for-profit education versus not-for-profit and largely tax-funded education. Nonetheless, it’s a trend that’s not about to fade. A Democrat in the White House in 2016 could inject fresh capital via increased federal grants, loans, and spending toward the education and training sector, which could bolster demand for these for-profit education firms.
Alternative energy. While Republicans may traditionally be the champions of oil and coal companies, Democrats are seen as favoring alternative energy sources or so-called green and clean energy. Of course, this issue could remain a topic that helps differentiate candidates, as even select GOP candidates are divided in their perspective on the future of U.S. energy. But as for stocks, think windmills, solar, geothermal, electric cars, and so on.
The landscape is growing. Population growth forecasts for the years ahead suggest energy demands will continue to climb. Sure, crude oil is cheap now, but commodities always seem to move in boom-and-bust cycles. There are plenty of renewable energy companies for investors to research. That research might include candidate positions, too. Energy issues tend to cross political boundaries.
Control of the White House matters, but don't forget that party control of Congress can either support or stall a president's priorities and agenda. The balance of power will be an important consideration when it comes to stock sectors that could gain a boost after all the votes are counted.
Part three of this election series takes on Republicans and affected stock sectors.
for thinkMoney ®
Financial Communications Society 2016
for Ticker Tape
Content Marketing Awards 2016
Content intended for educational/informational purposes only. Not investment advice, or a recommendation of any security, strategy, or account type.
Be sure to understand all risks involved with each strategy, including commission costs, before attempting to place any trade. Clients must consider all relevant risk factors, including their own personal financial situations, before trading.
Market volatility, volume, and system availability may delay account access and trade executions.
Past performance of a security or strategy does not guarantee future results or success.
Options are not suitable for all investors as the special risks inherent to options trading may expose investors to potentially rapid and substantial losses. Options trading subject to TD Ameritrade review and approval. Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options before investing in options.
Supporting documentation for any claims, comparisons, statistics, or other technical data will be supplied upon request.
This is not an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction where we are not authorized to do business or where such offer or solicitation would be contrary to the local laws and regulations of that jurisdiction, including, but not limited to persons residing in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, UK, and the countries of the European Union.
TD Ameritrade, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC, a subsidiary of The Charles Schwab Corporation. TD Ameritrade is a trademark jointly owned by TD Ameritrade IP Company, Inc. and The Toronto-Dominion Bank. © 2021 Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. All rights reserved.